Lesson 4: Awareness of Evil and Cultural Blindness
“The notion that this world… is in the grip of evil, is too well established… yet Christians have grown content to shrug off the more sombre implications of this truth.” “We have kept alive our Christian urge to discriminate between good and evil by the convenient device of labelling our own institutions good…” “We all know that flowers grow best in manured soil… The kind of humour is fundamental to our sense of proportion and therefore to our rationality.” Harry Blamires, The Christian Mind (London: SPCK, 1963), p. 86, 87, 97
1. Becoming Desensitized to Evil
Teaching: The author shows that people have become used to the idea of evil but no longer feel its seriousness. Instead of responding deeply, they treat it as something normal or distant. This dulls their ability to recognize real problems in society. Over time, awareness is replaced with indifference.
Key Idea:
Repeated exposure to evil without reflection causes people to become insensitive to it.
Key Takeaway:
What you ignore consistently will eventually stop bothering you.
2. Self-Justification Through Bias
Teaching: The author explains that people often label their own actions or groups as good while labeling others as evil. This creates a false sense of moral clarity without true self-examination. It allows people to feel right without questioning themselves. This reinforces bias instead of truth.
Key Idea:
People often define good and evil in ways that protect their own side rather than seeking truth.
Key Takeaway:
True understanding requires looking beyond personal bias.
3. The Church and Cultural Alignment
Teaching: The author argues that the Church cannot fully align itself with any political or cultural system. When it does, it risks losing its distinct perspective. Instead of challenging society, it may begin to reflect it. This weakens its ability to speak truth clearly.
Key Idea:
Aligning too closely with cultural systems weakens the ability to think and speak independently.
Key Takeaway:
You lose your voice when you fully blend into the system you should be evaluating.
4. Confusion Between Moral Behavior and Expression
Teaching: The author shows that people often judge morality based on how something is presented rather than its true message. For example, something serious may be labeled “moral,” while something humorous may be seen as “immoral,” even if that is not accurate. This creates confusion about what actually defines moral behavior. The focus shifts from truth to presentation.
Key Idea:
People often confuse moral truth with the way it is expressed or presented.
Key Takeaway:
Moral understanding requires looking beyond surface presentation.
5. Distortion of Moral Language
Teaching: The author explains that modern culture often changes the meaning of words related to morality. Negative behaviors are sometimes described using positive or respectable terms, which makes them seem acceptable. This confuses people about what is truly right or wrong. Over time, this weakens clear moral judgment.
Key Idea:
Changing the meaning of moral language can make harmful actions appear acceptable.
Key Takeaway:
When language is distorted, understanding of right and wrong becomes unclear.
Applicable Reflections
Spiritual Application:
-
Take Evil Seriously:
Reflect on how real-world problems show deeper moral issues, not just surface-level ones. -
Stay Aware, Don’t Become Numb:
Avoid becoming desensitized by regularly thinking critically about what you see. -
Examine Your Own Bias:
Question whether you are labeling things as good or bad based on truth or personal preference. -
Pay Attention to Language:
Notice how certain behaviors are described and question whether the language is accurate.
What does Blamires have to say?
“A peculiar quality of the Christian mind is that, knowing the weakness of human nature, it expects conflict in the moral sphere. It assumes that the powers of evil will exploit every possible occasion for drawing into the mental confusion of blurred concepts and twisted values.”
HARRY BLAMIRES, THE CHRISTIAN MIND (LONDON: SPCK, 1963), p. 102.